Skip to Content

Cost pressures

​Councils face several pressures which create financial viability risks and increase the amount of revenue required through rates.

The main causes of the financial pressures are cost shifting, superannuation shortfall, declining government grants, state levies, state and federal regulations, and reporting obligations.

Declining government grants

Local government nationally collects 3.4 per cent of the $415.86 billion total taxes raised by all three levels of government.

Indexation of core financial assistance grants from the Commonwealth to local government has been frozen at CPI for the next three years, resulting in a $91 million black hole in council budgets.

These grants can make up to 31 per cent of a council’s budget.

Core financial assistance has declined from 1.2 per cent of Commonwealth revenue in 1993-94 to 0.59 per cent in 2013-14. Government grants are usually indexed to CPI or less, meaning that grants are lower than actual cost movements to deliver the service, leaving councils to fund the gap from rates revenue.

Cost shifting

Cost shifting occurs when Commonwealth and State programs transfer responsibilities to local government with insufficient funding or grants which don’t keep pace with delivery costs.

Rates revenue is commonly used to cover funding shortfalls to meet increasing service demands, new government policy, rising costs and community expectations.

Cost shifting continues to confront councils in the key community service areas of home and community care, public libraries, school crossing supervisors and emergency management.

For more information, see: Cost shifting and government agreements.

Infrastructure renewal gap

Victorian councils are responsible for community infrastructure worth $73 billion, but replacement costs will be much higher for future ratepayers if infrastructure is not adequately maintained.

There is an infrastructure renewal gap when assets deteriorate faster than councils can fund their maintenance and renewal. A 2013 Auditor General report confirmed an annual underspend of $225 million. As councils have a limited capacity to raise this additional revenue, they often use a range of funding options such as rate rises, lower service levels, asset rationalisation and borrowings. 

Local government cost increases

Projections indicated that it will cost councils 3-4 per cent more in 2014 to deliver the same level and range of services as 2013. This is due to council services being affected by growth in construction, material and wage costs, rather than changes in common household goods and services as measured by CPI.

The main council costs are staff to deliver human-based services; and staff and materials to construct, maintain and upgrade roads and assets.

Superannuation shortfall

By 1 July 2013, councils were required to pay a $396.9 million shortfall to the closed Local Authorities Superannuation Fund Defined Benefit Plan following an actuary review by the scheme’s trustee Vision Super.

The former Defined Benefit Plan for local government employees was a compulsory scheme set up by the Victorian Government in 1982 and was closed in 1993. It must be fully funded to pay the benefits owed to members now and into the future, unlike state and federal public sector super funds which remain unfunded by $22.9 billion and $72 billion respectively.

Councils have a legal obligation to fund these compulsory contributions, often using cash reserves, borrowing money, selling surplus assets or through rates.

For more information on the shortfall, see:

State Government levies and fees

The Victorian Government requires councils to collect State levies. This includes landfill levies and the the fire services property levy, which are paid by ratepayers but must be passed on in full to the Government.

While most State fees rise by 2.5 per cent on 1 July each year, State-set planning fees have been frozen since 2009, with ratepayers contributing millions more to cover the revenue shortfall facing councils.

MAV documents

More information