Skip to Content

Fire

We are working towards a consistent and integrated approach to fire management planning with Victorian agencies, and state and local government.

This includes representing councils on a number of state-level fire-related committees, such as the State Fire Management Planning Committee.

We coordinated the local government response to the 2009 Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission: Final report recommendations and the Victorian Government’s implementation strategy.

As a result of the Royal Commission process, councils are implementing a number of new fire-related policy and programs. To support councils with the increased workload, we lobbied for state-funded resources for councils and ran a recruitment process to engage fire and emergency management coordinators.

We also wrote a submission in response to the Victorian Fire services property levy options paper.

2013-14 Fire Season Compliance Report

The Inspector-General Emergency Management (IGEM) has released his 2013-14 Fire Season Compliance Report (PDF - 1.24MB).

The report is the result of an investigation into the progress and implementation of identified actions from the Post Season Operations Review Fire Danger Period 2013-14, and the Goongerah-Deddick Trail Fire and Mt Ray Fire community reports.

The identified actions investigated included:

  • road traffic management – in particular Traffic Management Points (TMPs)
  • community involvement in fire preparedness, response and recovery.

EMT arrangements

  • initial attack and utilisation of resources
  • cross border fire arrangements
  • other systemic issues identified from the 2013-14 fire season reports.

As part of the process, agencies and organisations were requested to provide IGEM with evidence regarding the progress made in implementing the actions. Relevant stakeholders within the sector and communities in East Gippsland were consulted prior to finalisation of the report.

Findings relating to councils include:

  • In relation to TMPs: the inclusion of persons with local knowledge, including representatives from local government, VicRoads, DEPI and other agencies on Incident Management Teams and Emergency Management Teams, to ensure relevant expertise in relation to traffic management is considered
  • In relation to Community Engagement: IGEM found that East Gippsland Shire Council had made positive progress in engaging with the community and agencies to better prepare and recover from emergencies.

Community Fire Refuges Pilot

Community Fire Refuges (refuges) were piloted at two school sites in the Yarra Ranges Shire and a co-located CFA fire station at Blackwood in Moorabool Shire. The pilot was initiated in response to recommendations from the Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission.

The Emergency Management Commissioner has publicly released its Community Fire Refuges Pilot Program Evaluation Report (PDF - 179.2KB). The MAV supported Yarra Ranges and Moorabool Shires throughout the pilot and advocated on behalf of the sector for councils to be relieved of their legislative responsibility to designate and therefore be liable for refuges in their municipality. We also stressed that councils should not be required to fund the building and on-going maintenance of refuges.

Additionally the MAV asserted that the scope of the pilot did not allow for a review of the suitability of refuges within broader bushfire safety policy which includes evacuation, warnings, community education and resilience. This position is further outlined in MAV’s submission to the Fire Services Commissioner Bushfire Shelter Options Discussion Paper.

The Pilot Program Evaluation Report supports these positions outlining that:

  • A detailed review of the Policy should be undertaken before the next fire season, before further refuges are established
  • Refuges must only be considered where no other shelter options are viable
  • The State Government should accept legal liability
  • Designation should be by the State Government, not the council. (legislation has been amended already to reflect this recommendation)
  • Funding and overall governance should be State-managed by a State department or agency, and
  • ‘Ownership’ of the Policy must be clearly identified.

More information